Los Angeles Bankruptcy Law Monitor : Los Angeles Bankruptcy Lawyer & Attorney : Christine Wilton Law Firm : Southern California Chapter 13 & Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, Foreclosure

As debtor's counsel, I get the sense that many Americans who need to file for bankruptcy are avoiding it still because of its stigma and the myths fed to them by their government, creditors, family and friends.  In spite of the 'file bankruptcy as a last resort' method to financial reform for American households, filings are soaring in 2010.

Liz Pullium Weston wrote about it in her article, Bankruptcy filings soaring again.  I can't tell when that article was written and that bugs me to some extent, but I can move on from that.  In May, the American Bankruptcy Institute issued their first quarter press release, that revealed that bankruptcy filings are up 17% in the first quarter over 2009; and, consumer filings are up 18.2% in the first quarter.  California is 8th on the list of states with the highest per capita filing rate for the 12-month period ending March 31, 2010, with our Central District experiencing a 57.8% increase. So, what does this mean for the remainder of the year?

I predict that you will see California sink into the ocean of financial despair with the continued housing market depression and the banks attempt to control the housing prices by holding inventory of foreclosed homes.  Foreclosures will continue to rise as the asset-backed securitized mortgages continue to reset over the next 7 to 10 years.  Remember that these teaser rate, sub-prime, fancy loans were sold straight into the housing crash in 2008.

When California decides to make the tough decisions in closing their budget gap, you will see more municipalities filing chapter 9, like Valejo, CA, when the state pulls funds from the communities and cuts services.  You see, states can't file bankruptcy like the local governments can.  The problem here is that the federal government can print money when they need it, and municipalities can file bankruptcy under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, but the states have no remedial measure other than to cut services and pull funds from the local governments.

The bottom line here is that financial reform starts with every American taking personal responsibility for their own household and taking stock of their options, including the option to choose to file bankruptcy under Chapter 7, 11, or 13, depending upon your own set of circumstances.  Most bankruptcy attorneys offer free consultations by phone and you should take advantage of their advice.  We help our clients steer clear of scams and help you to take stock of your liabilities, depending upon your current situation and your financial goals.  Yes, you can keep your stuff and lose your debts.  You can save your American Dream of home ownership. 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

Over on MSN Money, Liz Pulliam Weston wrote an article entitled, "Are You Foolish to Pay Your Mortgage?"  I get asked this question all the time, is it worth it to keep my home?  I'm passionate about this subject on behalf of my clients, whom I advise whether filing bankruptcy is in their best interests financially.  What really caught my eye about this article was Law Professor Brent White's paper, "Underwater and Not Walking Away: Shame, Fear and the Social Management of the Housing Crisis."  I agree with Liz that this is a must read for the finer points and Liz certainly summarizes his points from her perspective that we all need to do our best to save our homes and we all must make the best of a bad situation and know when it's time to walk away from our mortgages.

The good news is that California is a 'non-recourse' state.  This means that lender cannot pursue defaulting homeowners for deficiency judgments where they owe more than what the house is worth or what the lender might receive in a short sale or foreclosure sale.  For Californian's this is good news too because their will be no income tax on the cancelled debt or capital gains taxes to be paid on the deficiency. 

Knowing that we won't get taxed or sued after we walk away from our mortgages here in California should bring a sigh of relief, but when is it a good financial decision to walk away?  Professor White says that when the net cost of homeownership becomes more expensive than the net cost of renting is when you should walk away.  His article provides in-depth details and citations and even a hypothetical example of a couple who bought their home in 2006, at the height of the real estate boom. To make it easy, I've found a housing cost calculator on the internet that might help, but I wouldn't base any decision solely on this information.

I think the biggest challenge is to walk the imaginary road into the future and ask yourself whether you'll be better off in the long run.  I suggest that if you can afford your mortgage payment now, even though you're home's value is less than what you owe, you may be better off in 20 years than if you had rented.  Why?  In 20 years you will likely have paid down your principal, or even paid off your mortgage and if you've been maintaining your home, you're maintenance costs will likely have dropped.  If you rented for 20 years, you're still a renter and we all know the cost to rent will invariably rise over that time too.

I agree with Liz when she says to "Get Help."  Talk to your HUD Counselor, your tax professional and your local bankruptcy lawyer.  The sooner, the better.  Don't spend down any savings trying to save a sinking ship because you may end up in a worse financial situation. 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks