B is For Bankruptcy Petition Preparer

We have a serious issue here in the Central District with the BPP ["Bankruptcy Petition Preparer"].  The Central District of California has more than 25% of the entire nation's Pro Se Debtors, which are Debtors that file their bankruptcy case without an attorney.  That's a whopping 38,667 cases filed without an attorney.  This volume of self-represented parties in bankruptcy has a significant impact on judicial resources and access to justice for all in bankruptcy.  Extra time is required of the court's clerks, judges and attorneys to provide assistance and correct errors when these self-represented parties make mistakes in their papers.  A significant portion of these Debtors seek the assistance of a Bankruptcy Petition Preparer, The BPP.  Problems can and do occur when Consumers use non-lawyers to assist them.  You may be saving money now, but might need to hire an attorney later to fix mistakes if you hire the wrong BPP.  Last week, I posted a warning in, Attention Debtors Without an Attorney, and provided important information on where to get help for FREE.

11 U.S.C. Section 110 provides for penalties for persons who negligently or fraudulently prepare bankruptcy petitions.  The bankruptcy courts are now tracking BPPs and prohibiting those that frequently make mistakes from filing cases within the district.  The most common mistakes made by the BPP is the wrong exemptions are used to protect assets of the debtors from being taken by the Trustee.  So, when you hear horror stories of someone who filed bankruptcy and the trustee took their property to pay creditors, it could be they hired someone who incorrectly applied exemptions and the Debtor suffered the consequences.  This usually can be corrected, and this a good reason to hire an attorney from the beginning of your case.

Remember that a BPP cannot give you legal advice or tell you which set of exemptions to use in preparing your bankruptcy case and, if they do, they are engaging in the practice of law without a license to do so.  Cal. Bus. & Prof Code Sections 6125-6128 define what constitutes the practice of law and persons authorized. There is no substitute for proper advice from an attorney.  I cannot emphasize enough that many of our local practitioners will provide a FREE consultation to help you choose whether to file bankruptcy, if so, which Chapter to file under and what you can expect from the bankruptcy process.  Only a licensed attorney can provide such advice. 

There is help if you've been defrauded by a BPP.  We have fee shifting remedies where the fees paid can be diverted to the attorney you retain to correct the BPP's mistakes under 11 U.S.C. Sections 523, 526 and 110.  It's important to cooperate with the attorney and sign a declaration that states the problems you've had and why you had to hire an attorney.  Then, be sure to attend the hearing on that matter and explain the situation to the judge.  This will help you obtain the assistance from this attorney, perhaps without any additional money being paid out of pocket for the much needed service. 

Other B Words in the Bankruptcy Alphabet: Beware of These Credit Card Offers, Bar Date, and Bank Account Levy.

Photo Credit: Leo Reynolds

Keeping Your Home When Filing Bankruptcy

A fundamental part of deciding to file bankruptcy is helping our clients achieve their financial goals.  One of the toughest decisions clients struggle with is deciding whether to keep their homes.  Many Californians are faced with underwater property values; denied loan modifications; falling behind on mortgage payments when their teaser rate terms end; and the fact that we live in a non-judicial foreclosure state where a home can be foreclosed without notice to the courts.

The short answer to this daunting question is Yes you can keep your home and file for bankruptcy. Under Chapter 7 liquidation bankruptcy, it is always recommended that you be current on your mortgage payments and have equity within the California Exemption limits.  If you're behind on your mortgage payments, the most effective way to deal with the "mortgage arrears", as they are called, is to file bankruptcy under Chapter 13 where you get to make up those past due payments over a period of 3-5 years.

The deeper question is whether you're trying to save the impossible American Dream of owning a home and at what price are you willing to pay to have it?  Unless you're stripping off a second mortgage and willing tolitigate against your loan servicer or lender on the securitized mortgage issues, then you may be better off walking away from your home completely because the values will increase over time, but this recovery will take a very long time; 10 years or more.

The numbers are staggering when you look at what you currently owe against a continuing decline in property values and what your home may be worth by the time you're finished paying on that outrageous mortgage.  If you're determined, committed and willing to go the distance and keep your home, the most economical method of saving your home is by filing bankruptcy under Chapter 13 if you're behind on your payments. 

Wells Fargo Won't Stop Freezing Bank Accounts

Many a Creditor has driven us bankruptcy lawyers and our clients nuts with their antics, but freezing a client's bank account after their case has been filed takes the cake.  The Ninth Circuit BAP just released In re Mwangi Case No. 09-1408 (9th Cir.B.A.P., June 30, 2010), which held that Wells Fargo's national policy of placing administrative holds on accounts of persons filing a bankruptcy petition violates the automatic stay by exercising control over property of the estate.  The issue in Mwangi was their national procedure of running a computerized comparison of all newly filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases against Wells Fargo's list of account holders.  If they found a match of one of their account holders who had also filed bankruptcy, then Wells Fargo would immediately 'freeze' that account, preventing the debtor from having access to their money. 

It's no secret that Wells Fargo has been notorious for freezing the accounts of debtors filing bankruptcy under Chatper 7.  We also have it on good word that Wells Fargo will continue to hold funds while they appeal the Mwangi case. 

Keep in mind that your bank account is property of the estate upon filing your bankruptcy case that presumably includes the cash in your bank accounts.  So, don't go on a spending spree just yet.  Any Exempt funds are not exempt until 60 days after the conclusion of your meeting of creditors.  Technically, all of your assets, including cash on hand must be turned over the trustee to administer your estate, but that is just not practical.  This means that the law is not on your side here and while Wells Fargo can put a freeze on your accounts, they also must act prudently by asking for guidance and direction from the Trustee and/or Court as to what to do with your funds.

This reminds me of the term "vicious compliance."  This term seems to crop up in certain union worker circles when they don't like a particular ruling or law, they will strictly comply with it and demonstrate that it doesn't work and then use it against management by knowing it better.  So, if Wells Fargo wanted to 'viciously' comply with the law, they would stop freezing accounts and simply send all the money to the trustee.  No matter how you slice this ruling, Wells Fargo is still a big bully.