The Dodd-Frank Act: Too Little Too Late?

 We're still uncovering the fraud perpetrated by the mortgage meltdown and have yet to deal with the more than 95 million securitized mortgages that have yet to adjust.  We have seen tremendouse changes in the industry as new laws and regulations are changing the way the industry does business. In the January issue of Los Angeles Lawyer, Beth S. DeSimone, James D. Richman and Tengfei (Harry) Wu of the firm Arnold & Porter, LLP wrote an in-depth article entitled, "Down Payment: The Dodd-Frank Act takes aim at the primary abuses uncovered during the mortgage meltdown." I think the changes in the law are nothing more than a little bit of "CYA" by our government's "turn the other cheek" approach to regulating industry. I mean really, it's only the largest single debt you'll ever enter into in your life, why shouldn't the industry make a little money?  

So, from the mortgage meltdown, we have a new government agency called the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFBP); don't you feel better now?; and perhaps the most important change is the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act signed into law by Obama on July 21, 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act changes the way mortgage lenders, brokers, appraisers, settlement service providers and other industry participants will conduct business.  It doesn't change the past and may not do enough in protecting consumers, but it sure does make our absent minded government seem interested in the issues. What I really like about these new rules is that a violation is an assertable defense for a borrower in a foreclosure action, without regard to the statute of limitations under Section 1413.

Another important point is that there is a safe harbor for lenders making a qualified mortgage loan that provides seven characteristics under Section 1412.

1. The loan must no permit negative amortization, or subject to certain exceptions, deferred principal;

2. Subject to certain exeptions, it must not require any balloon payment;

3. The income and assets relied on to qualify the borrower must be verified and documented;

4. Underwriting must be based on the full amortization over the loan term;

5. The debt-to-income ratio must not exceed certain guidelines to be set by regulation;

6. Total points and fees must not exceed 3 percent of the total loan amount; and

7. The loan term must not exceed 30 years, subject to certain exceptions.

"Down Payment" provides more detail into the new regulations and features of the Dodd-Frank Act and is a must read for those practitioners helping consumers with their mortgages and real property. Consumers reading this article should take note of the safe-harbour characteristics outlined above because I believe that these should be consumer guidelines when shopping for a mortgage loan.  

5 Tips To Avoid Loan Modification Scams

The folks over at Public Counsel Law Center are always providing valuable information to consumers.  Public Counsel Law Center is the nation's leading Pro Bono Law Firm and they do a great job in bankruptcy practice with their reaffirmation clinics and the new help desks at the clerk intake counter. Here are their

5 tips to avoid loan modification scams:

1.  Don't Pay Up Front Fees;

2. Don't Transfer Title or Sell Your House to a "foreclosure rescuer;"

3. Don't Pay your Mortgage Payments to Anyone Other Than Your Lender or Loan Servicer;"

4. Never Sign Any Documents Under Pressure or Without an Opportunity to Review Them.

5. Don't Ignore Letters From Your Lender or Loan Servicer.  Responding is the Best Bet For Saving Your House.

If someone demands an up-front fee, Public Counsel adivses that you can report them to the Attorney General's Office at 1-800-952-5225; or file a complaint online. Remember that the best way to get a workout is to work directly with your lender. 

Remember that the foreclosure process will continue on your home during your attempts to workout a modification agreement with your lender.  You may also want to consult with a bankruptcy lawyer to create an exit strategy if your modification offer falls through and you still want to keep your home. The filing of a bankruptcy case will legally stop the foreclosure process and will give you the breathing room you need to continue to work with your lender and have an advocate on your side.

Chapter 11 Mortgage Cramdown For Investment Properties

During the housing boom, many investment properties were purchased to increase income and build portfolios. Now, many of these properties are underwater and no longer producing income as tenants struggle to pay rents. If you're an individual investor in a similar situation and you're wondering what to do with your investment property portfolio, consider the benefit of what is called a "cramdown" of those mortgages under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Secured loans may be modified under Chapter 11.  Professor Jonathan Hayes writes in his book, A Summary of Bankruptcy Law, "In general, secured creditors must be paid in full with reasonable interest for a reasonable amount of time. Section 1129(b)(2)(A). In full means the total amount owed, or the value of the collateral if that is less than the amount owed." This means that, "a high interest, short term loan may be rewritten to reasonable interest for a period of years," say Hayes. However, a loan secured solely by the debtor's home many not be adjusted pursuant to 1123(b)(5).

What this means is that you can "cramdown" the amount you owe on these investment property mortgages to the current market value. This will restructure the debt to an affordable level and allow the potential rental income to support this lower payment.

Married Filing an Individual Bankruptcy: How Does This Affect My Spouse?

Married couples facing tough financial decisions must also face eachother. Here in California, we are in what is called a community property state.  That means that income earned during marriage and debts incurred during marriage are part of the marriage community. In contemplating bankruptcy, couples must know that the act of filing a bankruptcy case creates an estate for the purposes of liquidation under Chapter 7, or reorganization under Chatpers 13 or 11.

The bankruptcy estate consists of all the assets and debts of that estate.  So, your spouse's income, expenses and debts will come into the bankruptcy case even if they do not sign the bankruptcy papers. The bad news is that you're in this together. The good news is that you can also rebuild your credit quicker after bankruptcy.

Depending upon how the assets of your community estate are set up, will depend on how you should best proceed in bankruptcy. So, talk to your spouse first about your finances and set a goal for yourselves. Once you're teamed up and have your goal in mind, consult with your tax professional, financial planner and your local bankruptcy lawyer  to determine which direction is best for you.  There are many solutions to your current situation and the best strategy is to stay united and enlist help from several professional resources. Most professionals will consult with you for free, so take their advice and then make your decision from a well informed position.

Testimony in In re Kemp Damaging for Mortgage Industry

 The Court in In re Kemp 2010 WL 4777625 (Bankr. D. N.J. November 10, 2010) held that a claim filed by a mortgage servicer would be disallowed when that creditor did not have possession of the note and the note was not endorsed to the creditor at the time the claim was filed. The bankruptcy court cited New Jersey's Uniform Commercial Code in disallowing the creditor's claim because Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. d/b/a America's Wholesale Lender could not prove that it was the holder in possession of the note; Non-holder in possession; nor Non-holder not in possession of the note. Here in California we have similar codes under the California Commercial Code ("CCC"). 

What this case means for debtors is that debtors must be clearly prepared to challenge claims asserted by their mortgage lenders and/or servicers. When debtor's counsel produce clear records of creditor's failures to document the chain of custody and assignments of promissory notes debtors will successfully knock out these claims.  Debtors counsel must cross-examine witnesses; propound opposing parties for admissible evidence and demonstrate the creditor's failure to follow the CCC.

Once successful in opposing the Proof of Claim filed by the Creditor, the Debtor can then file an Adversary Proceeding (lawsuit) against the creditor to determine the extent, priority and/or validity of the lien as the motion to disallow the claim does not address this issue.

Attorneys representing debtors must be prepared to demand proof of authority and ownership of the note and challenge the effectiveness of any attempt to assign or transfer the note or deed of trust after the bankruptcy case was filed or on the eve of trial because these action not only violate the automatic stay in some cases; they may also violate the securitized trust pooling and servicing agreement.