Meet Your Chapter 7 Trustees

The Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys Association (CDCBAA) hosted, an MCLE program on September 12th called, “The Chapter 7 Trustees.” Southwestern Law School co-sponsored the event and provided the wonderful location. The panel trustees consisted of Jeffrey I. Golden, Amy L. Goldman, David Seror, Diana C. Weil, and Edward Wolkowitz.  The trustees set forth to air their “pet peeves” and reinforced their duties and obligations as set forth in the Handbook for Chapter 7 Trustees.
 

11 U.S.C. Section 341(a), known as the "meeting of creditors" is required and it is mandatory that the debtor appear in person before the trustee at this meeting. “Appearing in person” requires the debtor to bring their current valid driver’s license with any extensions and social security card. The trustee is looking for a substantial deviation from the name(s) reported on the petition and the identity of the person appearing before them. If there is a substantial deviation in the name, an amendment to the petition is a best practice.

In preparing the debtor for their 341(a) meeting, I will provide my clients with the 10 mandatory questions that the trustee must ask and make sure they bring their “current,” “valid” identification forms, a signed copy of their petition and I will bring a copy of their tax return.

As for priority at the section 341(a) meetings, we were advised the following: Even though small children are to be left at home, anyone with small children are likely to be handled expeditiously. One attorney commented that this is a little known priority and parents have been offered as much as five dollars for the use of their children for this priority. Otherwise, represented debtors are given priority at these meetings.

What is important to note is that the goal is to avoid a continuance. Disclosure and explanation is never a problem for the trustees and being helpful by noting any discrepancies is actually refreshing. We must continue to lead by example and assist the trustees in maintaining a respectful and dignified space in the hearing room for the benefit of all debtors.
 

The Economy of Bankruptcy

In the Central District of California, year-to-date bankruptcy filings are up 70% over last year.  Chapter 7 filings make up 77% of the total filings year to date. Why? Because California’s unemployment rate is at an all time high and holding at 12.1% according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.   EDD says we’re at 11.9%

Let’s just pour salt upon the open wound and admit that California was also the sub-prime loan mecca all the way into the crash in 2008. These option arm loans were sold here in California well into late 2007 and the "teaser" or introductory rates on these loans sold were 5, 7, and 10 year terms. This means that we have yet to see the end of the foreclosure crisis here in California because these loans have not yet adjusted upward.

With a surplus of uninhabited homes on their hands, banks are left holding the bag in the foreclosure game. Unfortunately, many homeowners could have saved their homes, had they contacted an attorney, who would have determined any legal claims to stop the foreclosure, like Truth in Lending Act (TILA), predatory lending (Fraud), or Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) violations.  However, this is not as easy as it sounds and requires litigation.  A  chapter 13 bankruptcy has been the forum of choice to stop foreclosures and save homes.  Unfortunately, SB 61, has not passed, but is still being discussed.  SB 61 would allow bankruptcy courts to modify mortgages and reduce principal loan balances in bankrutpcy.

We are all in this together and this market affects us all.  At no other time has it become more apparent that we join together for the solution.

The Automatic Stay by Bankrupcy Man!

  Yesterday I received an invitation to connect with Steven Horowitz on LinkedIn.  His invitation to connect was unassuming, "I publish the Bankruptcy Bill and BAPCPA Man cartoons and thought it might make sense to link up."  I am open to build my professional network via LinkedIn and you may connect with me directly here.  As I surfed through several groups I belong to on the website, I came accross his blog, BankruptcyBill.  

Considering the negative stigma around bankruptcy law and in light of our nation's economic woes, these cartoons are a refreshing departure.  They're easy to read and understand.  They take the law and break it down into layman's terms; a gift I rather admire.  In BAPCPA MAN #2, he discusses the automatic stay as a force field that protects the debtor from their creditors.  The cartoon is a fun explanation of the law and below the cartoon itself, are links that provide the reader with additional information on the topic discussed.

It's genius!  The blog also provides links to other bankruptcy lawyer blogs and the authors even write Haikus.  You're invited to add your own in the comments section of the website.  What is a Haiku?  Here is my version of a bankruptcy haiku:

I love bankruptcy.  It will get you a fresh start.  A bright future now.

I am a fan of creativity.  I encourage you to check out the blog.  My only suggestion is that it should be published on LexBlog's platform; I'm biased that way.

A Summary of Bankruptcy Law; Book Review

I have been reading everything bankruptcy related lately.  A few weeks ago, M. Jonathon Hayes sent us an email on our listserv for the Central District Consumber Bankrutpcy Attorneys Association, CDCBAA for short, that he had just published a new book entitled, A Summary of Bankruptcy Law.  I am one of those folks who likes summaries or digest versions of anything that cuts to the point and gives me just the meat, hold the potatoes and vegetables. 

The section on chapter 7 bankruptcies takes up a major portion of the summary material.  I would have liked more information regarding chapter 13 processes, but it is a summary, so I let that go.  The material is concise and to the point.  It's an easy read and looks similar to a top tier law student's outline of a subject.  Not that I was a top tier law student, but I've obtained outlines from a few.  Overall, the book holds up to its title as a summary and I would add, a thorough summary at that.

Like kicking the tires on a car you're thinking about buying, I took the book's website citations and case citations for a spin.  The book provides valuable tools, advice on practice materials and case citations that I am still looking up.  I reccommend this book to the new practioner and law student.  Since the book was written by a California attorney,  it is well suited for the California practitioner and more specifically, those of us practicing in the Central District.  I even printed a copy of Judge randall Newsome's Research Notebook and if I ever get a chance to meet the man, I promise to buy him a beer Jonathon.  Thank you for your good work.